It is very truely said that Old is Gold. Nevertheless, The threat to today's world is War which the most paniciking the weapon which will shake the World peace. On the other hand diplomacy is the weapon of first choice. At the same time it must be realized that Diplomacy and War two different sides of same coin. We learn from the past , implement in present for better, safe and secure future. Here I really mean to say is the because of old diplomacy excited in past we can frame new diplomacy by plus and minus points from the old ones. In other words, Both the expressions ' Old and New are born from each other but in reality their is no relations, commented Jules Cambon. The following video in very funny manner explains the protocol of British Diplomacy traditionally i.e about 500 years and their strategic plans.
Somehow, It is very true that Under the old diplomacy, global policymaking was more strictly the purview of governments. Also going through article guardian artcile 'This is not any old summit. Poker diplomacy has to end' also opens another window of our mind. I will be posting one more example soon , I just couldn't get hold of that article but as soon as I have it will be posting it, but my question still remains who do they both exist ?Hence, everthing that shines and sparks is not a gold. There are lot many articles which I gone through that confused me to decide contemprary relevance of old Diplomacy.
It is very interesting video representing the British humour on its view towards Europe. I think however that this is changing in the direction of wider cooperation and integration. The United Kingdom has recognized the economic success of the European Union and its demising mercantile with the Commonwealth. The diplomatic relations have altered but the self-interest of the state remains with same importance without the same actors.
ReplyDelete