Following lecture and seminar for New Diplomacy by Prof.Steven made it very clear that with the phase of time we can differentiate "Old Diplomacy and New Diplomacy" on many grounds. It is also end up in seminar discussion that it is also a chemistry where Diplomatic strategy acts as 'CATALYST' as it reacts with the substance, aims and attitudes of a state's relations with others on different levels under the element of social, economical or political aspect of nation. Hence, we can also that chemistry of international relations in terms of 'Diplomacy' has created a cohesive bond and also globalised.
But if we look bit more closely and considering literal meaning of diplomacy; the main function of diplomacy is negotiation - which broadly means discussions designed to identify common interest and areas of conflict between the parties. To establish the conditions under which negotiations can take place a number of other tasks are undertaken. But changes have occurred both in the conduct of diplomacy and in the personnel associated with it. So following changes can be considered as a result of the increasing complexity of inter-state relations with reference of Sinning, Vince in their book of "Diplomacy In The 21st Century" (CODIA, 2002)
- The intrusion of ideological conflict and the opening up of diplomatic dialogue.
- The change of emphasis from bilateral to multilateral dealings.
- The decline in the decision-making power of the ambassador.
- The advent of personal diplomacy.
- The increased use of experts and specialists.
- The involvement of ministries not normally associated with foreign affairs.
- The increased number of treaties.
- The growth in importance of the media.
- The expansion of the international community and of non-state actors.
This enhancement and enlargement of the scope of modern diplomacy and the widening of its agenda has resulted in a change of emphasis and hand on economic sector, rather than on any major change in function. In response to the rapid changes in information technology, diplomacy today refers not only to the advancement of national interests and the practice of persuasion but also to the management of global issues.
At the end I can say, it has created lots of changes but without itself getting changed. I think title to New Diplomacy as 'Catalyst' is suitable for us to understand current situation of it existence. Yes, certainly there are some changes in the norms and fields as mentioned above.
Also click and have a look at: Transformation of diplomacy in the 21st century
You are welcome to address if something wrong or something you find interesting and want to add more ideas.
At the end I can say, it has created lots of changes but without itself getting changed. I think title to New Diplomacy as 'Catalyst' is suitable for us to understand current situation of it existence. Yes, certainly there are some changes in the norms and fields as mentioned above.
Also click and have a look at: Transformation of diplomacy in the 21st century
You are welcome to address if something wrong or something you find interesting and want to add more ideas.
No comments:
Post a Comment